🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an global treaty designed to safeguard women from violence, including family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The final authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to end all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in last year, yet conservative factions have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked widespread protest both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention in 2021, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly send back the legislation for further consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal factors, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in several EU countries
• The European treaty requires particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could influence similar discussions in additional member states