🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing chorus of states are moving toward similar measures.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". A law may be passed soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to pass a law lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged parents to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement supporting a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is given. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the step does not create binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a useful foundation," stated a leading European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Last year, interest grew behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. However, the government committed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. A prominent charity established by the family of a girl who was lost after encountering harmful online content argues that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to build products and services that are secure and age appropriate for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, legislation is mostly occurring at the state level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws demanding guardian approval for under-16s to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from some individuals to mimic Australia's example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, other countries are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

Even as this global conversation unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and its followers demonstrate that states globally are increasingly content to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.